<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discourse on Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etherwave.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/discourse-on-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etherwave.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/discourse-on-style/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to improving how we write, teach, and think about the history of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Thomas</title>
		<link>http://etherwave.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/discourse-on-style/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etherwave.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/discourse-on-style/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>If pressed, I&#039;d like to recant my &quot;bulk of the impact&quot; statement.  Sociology is probably directly responsible for a heightened emphasis on practice, which has been enormously productive (and is actually my favorite kind of history).  I guess when I write &quot;impact&quot;, I mean impact that we couldn&#039;t have gotten from concurrent trends in mainstream cultural history.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A policy note: I never retract or alter any substantive argument in a post without signaling that I did so with an &quot;edit&quot;.  In the spirit of blogging, these are all raw thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If pressed, I&#8217;d like to recant my &#8220;bulk of the impact&#8221; statement.  Sociology is probably directly responsible for a heightened emphasis on practice, which has been enormously productive (and is actually my favorite kind of history).  I guess when I write &#8220;impact&#8221;, I mean impact that we couldn&#8217;t have gotten from concurrent trends in mainstream cultural history.</p>
<p>A policy note: I never retract or alter any substantive argument in a post without signaling that I did so with an &#8220;edit&#8221;.  In the spirit of blogging, these are all raw thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
